🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils will be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.