🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."